Are you sure you want to cancel your registration?
Cancelling your registration will remove your access to the event. If you proceed, you will no longer be able to participate or access event-related materials.
Are you sure you want to delete account?
Deleting your account will remove your access to the event.
Acceptance letters will be sent on August 31, 2025 The working program will be posted on the website. All selected contributions will be included in the conference’s e-program book.
Abstract review criteria
Criteria
Excellent (5)
Good (4)
Satisfactory (3)
Needs Improvement (2)
Unsatisfactory (1)
Relevance to Conference Topics
Abstract is highly relevant, directly addressing conference topics in a meaningful and innovative way.
Clearly relevant with some innovative ideas.
Moderately relevant; connection to conference topics is evident but not strong.
Limited relevance, weak connection to conference topics.
Irrelevant or does not address conference topics.
Significance to the Field
Addresses highly significant questions or problems in the field with potential for meaningful impact.
Addresses relevant and important issues, with moderate impact.
Significance is clear but limited in scope or impact.
Addresses minor or less critical issues; impact is unclear.
Does not address significant questions or issues in the field.
Style and Organization
Abstract is exceptionally well-organized, with a clear beginning, middle, and end; easy to follow.
Generally well-organized with minor areas for improvement in flow.
Moderately organized; structure is clear but could be improved.
Organization is weak, with unclear transitions or flow.
Poorly organized; abstract is difficult to follow.
Sufficient Background
Provides clear, concise, and sufficient background to understand the context and importance of the work.
Provides adequate background, though some minor details may be missing.
Background is somewhat sufficient but lacks clarity or depth.
Background is weak, lacking sufficient context or important details.
Background is insufficient or absent, making the abstract unclear.
Methodological Rigor
Methods are well-described, appropriate, and rigorous, showing strong potential for reliability and validity.
Methods are appropriate and adequately described with minor gaps.
Methods are somewhat clear but lack detail or rigor.
Methods are inadequately described or weak.
Methods are inappropriate, poorly described, or missing.
Logical and Reasonable Conclusion
Conclusions are logical, well-supported, and directly address the abstract’s objectives.
Conclusions are reasonable but could be better developed or clarified.
Conclusions are present but somewhat weak or lack direct support.
Conclusions are weak, poorly supported, or unclear.
Abstract lacks a reasonable or logical conclusion.
Originality and Innovation
Highly original, offering new insights or innovative approaches to the field.
Some originality and innovation; adds value to existing knowledge.
Moderately original; limited new insights.
Minimal originality; reiterates existing knowledge without new contributions.
Lacks originality; no new insights provided.
Grammar and Language
Abstract is free of errors, written in professional and concise language.
Minor language or grammatical issues that do not affect readability.
Some grammatical or language issues that slightly hinder clarity.
Frequent grammatical or language issues that affect readability.
Numerous grammatical or language errors, making the abstract difficult to understand.
Word Count and Formatting
Fully adheres to word count and formatting guidelines.
Slightly exceeds or falls short of word count or has minor formatting issues.
Moderately deviates from word count or formatting requirements.
Largely non-compliant with word count or formatting guidelines.
Does not adhere to word count or formatting requirements at all.
Abstract submission guidelines
Abstracts must be submitted online through our website.
Submitting an abstract does not constitute or guarantee registration.
Abstracts will be published in the e-program of the conference.
Abstract content and editing are the responsibility of the submitting author.
Submission of the abstract means consent to the publication of the abstract in the e-program of the conference.
Abstract Submission Form
Loading...
Ticket
Are you sure you want to change your ticket selection ?
